We all enter the world through a woman and (spoiler alert) everyone dies.
Regardless how you exit this world (natural causes or freak accident) no human being’s immortal. We’re all here today and gone tomorrow.
Aside from various man-created hierarchies, are there any universal categories to determine who’s greatest amongst us?
Today, people judge others on:
• What family they come from?
• Their level of attractiveness?
• What occupation they have?
• How financially stable they are?
All these categories are based on one person’s opinion over another’s. Yet, they’re all shallow reasons and, in the end, everyone’s time runs out.
How are Value and Worth Determined for Human Beings?
Considering how fragile life is, it’s almost comical how one human being believes they have the right to determine the value of another fellow human on genetics alone.
If everyone comes into the world through a woman, and eventually dies, how can any human lay claim to be superior over another? No one’s immortal. Everyone’s life expectancy is around 80 – 100 years. Therefore, the only way anyone can claim dominance over another is through complete ignorance.
Like members of the Klu Klux Klan (KKK).
Each member of the white supremacy group arrived into the world through a woman and eventually will die, exactly like the very people they hate. Therefore, only through complete ignorance handed down from generation to generation would members of the KKK believe they’re superior over anyone.
Adolf Hitler believed the Arian race was superior to any other. Yet, the 1936 Olympics and World War II revealed the Arian race wasn’t, in fact, the most superior race. A reality Hitler came to terms with moments before taking his own life.
It poses the question, “How could white supremacy groups or the Nazi’s believe their lives were more valuable than those they oppressed?”
What Technology Can’t Confirm
With the latest advancements in medical technology, we’re able to see a child inside the womb. Technology can identify many physical traits of a child before they come into the world.
Yet, what technology cannot determine is the value and worth of a child.
Currently, no machine exists which can identify a child’s real potential to either be a benefit or burden on society.
Studies confirm the majority of abortions are single moms who prefer a future without the inconvenience of a child. Which begs the question, “What’s so important in a woman’s life who elects to have their baby’s life end?”
What’s so important in the mother’s future which warrants all distractions be eliminated?
Will her important plans have a long term effect on society – even after she passes away? Is she working on a cure for cancer? Will she be able to figure out how to repair the ozone layer? Or, is her decision self-serving?
And- REALITY CHECK – even if those scenarios were actually the case, guess what, she could have the child and still pursue her passion.
What pro-choice supporters refer to as “justifications” are actually lame excuses to manipulate themselves into believing they’re doing some type of justice for the world, especially the most manipulating reason ever, “I just couldn’t bring that not wanting to bring the child into this world to save it from potential suffering.”
Can Value Be Determined Inside Woman’s Womb?
In determining if a life will be a benefit or a burden on society, some type of special characteristic or trait would need to be identified early on while a child was still in the womb, perhaps through an advanced ultrasound.
Ultrasounds which could zero in on certain character traits in determining the child’s overall benefit or threat.
At the present time, ultrasounds only determine we’re all the same, that we’re all, in fact, equal. Which means, to have an unborn fetus killed is to pretend you have the right to know they’ll be more of a burden on your life, and the false truth your life is so important than theirs.
As Americans, we’re granted the right to life, not the right for a convenient life. Our life is determined by the choices we make.
Who Should Die?
Those who murder don’t respect life. Therefore, they’re not worthy to keep theirs! Murderers choose to kill for their own personal reasons.
They’re people who kill their genetic equals.
If someone chooses not to respect the life of their genetic equal (i.e., serial killers) then it’s justified to have that person executed. Why? Because they infringe on another human being’s right to life.
During trials, there’s a point where family members and friends are allowed to share their pain with the killer. Generally, during those testimonies, those who speak try to humanize victims in an effort to shame and guilt killers.
Yet, when it comes to abortion, the goal is to dehumanize the infant in the womb.
So, murdering outside the womb comes with consequences, yet if the child’s inside a womb, U.S. lawmakers and pro-choice supporters consider it to be a noble act.
The irony is, U.S. laws lock up or execute killers because they’re a threat to our society while providing women the legal right to kill their equals without repercussions.